LLM Fundamentals
Core concepts underlying modern Large Language Models. Essential grounding for agent engineering.
Attention Mechanism
Attention(Q, K, V) = softmax(QK^T / √d_k) V
| Component |
Role |
| Query (Q) |
What we're looking for |
| Key (K) |
What we're matching against |
| Value (V) |
What we're extracting |
| Scale (√d_k) |
Prevents gradient vanishing for large d_k |
Multi-Head Attention
- Multiple attention heads in parallel
- Each head learns different relational patterns
- Concatenated + projected:
MultiHead(Q,K,V) = Concat(head_1...head_h)W^O
Input → LayerNorm → MultiHeadAttention → Residual
→ LayerNorm → FFN (GeLU/SwiGLU) → Residual → Output
Key variants:
- Pre-LN (standard): LayerNorm before attention/FFN
- Post-LN (original): LayerNorm after residual
- Parallel: Attention + FFN in parallel (PaLM, GPT-NeoX)
Training Pipeline
1. Pretraining
Objective: Next-token prediction (causal LM)
L = -Σ log P(x_t | x_<t; θ)
Data: Trillions of tokens (CommonCrawl, code, books, Wikipedia)
- Deduplication critical for quality
- Data mixing ratios heavily tuned
- Curriculum learning (easy → hard) sometimes used
Compute scaling laws (Kaplan et al., Chinchilla):
L(N, D) ≈ E + A/N^α + B/D^β
- Optimal:
N ∝ D^0.5 (Chinchilla) vs N ∝ D^0.3 (Kaplan)
- Compute-optimal: Train smaller models longer on more data
2. Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT)
Objective: Instruction following
- High-quality (prompt, response) pairs
- Formats: Alpaca, ShareGPT, ChatML, system+user+assistant
- Data quality > quantity (LIMA: 1k examples sufficient)
3. Preference Alignment
| Method |
Mechanism |
Pros |
Cons |
| RLHF/PPO |
Reward model + RL |
Strong alignment |
Complex, unstable |
| DPO |
Direct preference optimization |
Simple, stable |
Requires paired prefs |
| KTO |
Kahneman-Tversky optimization |
Only needs (x, y, label) |
Newer, less proven |
| ORPO |
Odds ratio preference optimization |
No reference model |
Recent |
| RLAIF |
AI feedback (constitutional) |
Scalable |
Depends on critic quality |
4. Continued Pretraining / Domain Adaptation
- Additional pretraining on domain corpus (code, legal, medical)
- Often + SFT on domain instructions
- Catastrophic forgetting mitigated by replay, low LR
Inference Mechanics
Autoregressive Generation
for t in 1..T:
logits = model(x_<t)
x_t = sample(logits / temperature)
Sampling Strategies
| Strategy |
Description |
Use Case |
| Greedy |
argmax |
Deterministic, debugging |
| Temperature |
Softmax(logits/T) |
Creative (T>1), focused (T<1) |
| Top-k |
Keep top k tokens |
Balance diversity/quality |
| Top-p (nucleus) |
Keep minimal set with cumprob ≥ p |
Dynamic, popular default |
| Typical |
Tokens near expected information content |
Coherent, less repetitive |
KV Cache
- Problem: O(T²) attention recomputation
- Solution: Cache K, V for past tokens
- Memory: 2 × layers × heads × head_dim × seq_len × bytes
- Optimizations: Quantization (KV-8bit), sliding window, paging (vLLM)
Speculative Decoding
Draft model (small) → generates k tokens
Target model (large) → verifies in parallel
Accept/reject → if reject, fallback to target
- Speedup: 2-3× typical
- Draft models: Smaller distilled, n-gram, MLP predictor
Model Families & Architectures
| Model |
Architecture |
Context |
Notable |
| GPT-4/4o |
Dense (MoE rumored) |
128k/1M |
Multimodal, strong reasoning |
| Claude 3/3.5 |
Dense |
200k/1M |
Constitutional AI, long context |
| Llama 3/3.1 |
Dense (GQA) |
8k/128k |
Open weights, strong base |
| Qwen 2/2.5 |
Dense (GQA) |
32k/128k |
Multilingual, code strong |
| Nemotron 3/4 |
Dense |
4k/128k |
NVIDIA, alignment focus |
Mixture of Experts (MoE)
| Model |
Experts |
Active |
Notes |
| Mixtral 8x7B |
8 |
2 |
47B total, 13B active |
| Mixtral 8x22B |
8 |
2 |
141B total, 39B active |
| DeepSeek-V2/V3 |
160/256 |
6/8 |
MLA, auxiliary-loss-free |
| Qwen-MoE |
64 |
4 |
Open weights |
| Nemotron-4-340B |
? |
? |
NVIDIA, synthetic data |
Specialized Architectures
| Architecture |
Innovation |
Examples |
| MLA (Multi-head Latent Attention) |
Compressed KV cache |
DeepSeek-V2/V3 |
| GQA (Grouped Query Attention) |
Fewer KV heads |
Llama 3, Qwen, Gemma |
| MQA (Multi-Query Attention) |
Single KV head |
PaLM, Falcon |
| Sliding Window |
Local attention |
Mistral, LongLoRA |
| Linear Attention / RNN hybrids |
O(N) inference |
RWKV, Mamba, RetNet, Griffin |
Scaling Laws & Trade-offs
Chinchilla Scaling (Compute-Optimal)
| Compute (FLOPs) |
Params (N) |
Tokens (D) |
Example |
| 10^18 |
1.3B |
200B |
Small |
| 10^21 |
7B |
1.4T |
Medium |
| 10^24 |
70B |
14T |
Large |
| 10^25 |
340B |
60T |
Frontier |
Inference Cost Model
Cost ∝ (Prefill: O(N × L²) + Decode: O(N × L × T))
- Prefill: Quadratic in context (attention)
- Decode: Linear in context (KV cache)
- Optimization: Reduce N (distillation, quantization), reduce L (compression), reduce T (speculative)
Quantization
| Method |
Bits |
Quality Loss |
Speedup |
| FP16/BF16 |
16 |
None |
1× (baseline) |
| INT8 |
8 |
Minimal |
~1.5× |
| GPTQ/AWQ |
4 |
Low |
~2-3× |
| GGUF/llama.cpp |
2-8 |
Variable |
CPU-friendly |
| FP8 |
8 (E4M3/E5M2) |
Low |
H100 native |
Multimodal Foundations
Vision-Language
- Architecture: Vision encoder (ViT/CLIP) + projector + LLM
- Training: Image-text pairs → alignment → instruction tuning
- Examples: GPT-4o, Claude 3.5, LLaVA, Qwen-VL, InternVL
Audio/Speech
- Architecture: Audio encoder (Whisper-style) + projector + LLM
- Streaming: Chunked processing, voice activity detection
- Examples: GPT-4o Audio, Qwen-Audio, Moshi, Ultravox
Unified Multimodal
- Native: Single transformer from pixels/tokens/audio (Chameleon, Transfusion)
- Tokenization: Discrete tokens for all modalities (VQ-VAE, DAC)
Key References
| Topic |
Essential Reading |
| Transformer |
"Attention Is All You Need" (Vaswani et al., 2017) |
| Scaling Laws |
"Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models" (Kaplan et al., 2020) |
| Chinchilla |
"Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models" (Hoffmann et al., 2022) |
| RLHF |
"Training Language Models to Follow Instructions" (Ouyang et al., 2022) |
| DPO |
"Direct Preference Optimization" (Rafailov et al., 2023) |
| MoE |
"GShard: Scaling Giant Models" (Lepikhin et al., 2020) |
| DeepSeek MoE |
"DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical Mixture-of-Experts" (2024) |
| Speculative Decoding |
"Accelerating LLM Inference" (Leviathan et al., 2023) |
| vLLM |
"Efficient Memory Management for LLM Serving" (Kwon et al., 2023) |
Sources: Original papers, LLM training books (Sebastian Raschka, Huyen Chip), framework docs (vLLM, SGLang, TensorRT-LLM), scaling law replications, Chinchilla/Hoffmann et al., DeepSeek technical reports.